Thank you, Lopaka, for the startling alert to the British Monarchy situation!
Yes, in 1993-94 I made the initial public statements: Prince Charles will not be King of England. And then, in Predictions for a New Millennium (Llewellyn, 1996), on page 220, with much detail, I shared my prediction in full:
“Prince Charles will not be King of England --There is an interesting set of astrological measurement variables that emerges from study of the horoscopes of the ten English monarchs from George II born 1683 to Queen Elizabeth II. Charting five key measurements, 60% of all the monarchs had measurement one, 60% measurement two, 70% had the third one, and 40% and 30% had the next two, respectively. The startling observation in this overview is that Prince Charles, heir apparent to the throne, does not have any one of the measurement variables of the monarchs in his horoscope.”
Footnote 501 presents much more detail.
But the point is made, Charles is an island unto himself, [Charles: November 14, 1948 at 9:14 P.M. at Buckingham Palace].
“Prince Charles is born to express life in the ‘grand manner.’ Yet, if the emotional component gets the upper hand in his life, the structure of it all will collapse. Charles desperately needs a sympathetic audience for his position in life to flourish, and this audience is not his estranged wife Diana and it is not his mother. The Queen dominates Charles [see his Moon on his nodal axis in the parental axis], and he is forced to follow her way; privately, he retreats into a world of smoldering ambition in which he achieves a lone self-sufficiency (the Earth Grand Trine and Neptune=Sun/Saturn …sadness, loss of hope, delusions within relationship, aloneness”).
In appreciation always of your thoughtful postings,
Noel Tyl